- Speaker #0
Welcome back to the Deep Dive. Today, we are getting into something that I know is a huge pain point for so many of you using generative AI. It's that frustrating gap, you know, the one between what you ask for and what you actually get back. So today, we are cracking the code. We're doing a deep dive into the hidden rules behind high-quality AI prompts.
- Speaker #1
It is, I think, the single most crucial area to focus on right now. The problem is really one of expectation.
- Speaker #0
Right.
- Speaker #1
Most of us, we approach AI like a new employee. We give these vague instructions, something like, hey, write me some copy for this new service page.
- Speaker #0
And then we're shocked when it's terrible.
- Speaker #1
Exactly. We're disappointed when the output is, you know, super generic or needs hours and hours of cleanup.
- Speaker #0
We act like the AI can read our minds like it just knows our business strategy.
- Speaker #1
Read it.
- Speaker #0
But it can't. It responds to what you ask, not what you meant.
- Speaker #1
You can think of it like a genius toddler. It has incredible power, but... Zero life experience. So the secret to getting great content consistently, it all comes down to structure.
- Speaker #0
And that's what we're here to talk about, this structure.
- Speaker #1
It's what we call the Goldilocks Prompt Formula. It's a systematic five-part framework that is, well, just what it sounds like, not too vague, not too complicated.
- Speaker #0
But just right.
- Speaker #1
Absolutely just right. It helps you generate high-quality content that actually aligns with your strategy every single time. It turns it from guesswork into a system.
- Speaker #0
So our mission today is to unpack those five components. Once you get these, you'll start getting drafts that need, you know, minor tweaks, not major surgery. Right. And those five are objective, context, voice, structure, and constraints. We're going to get into why each one is so important. So, okay, where do we start?
- Speaker #1
Well, before we build the perfect prompt, I think we have to understand why most of them fail. Let's look at the mistakes this formula actually corrects. Okay,
- Speaker #0
the pitfalls. The first one has to be the most obvious, right? The vague request trap. You ask the AI to write about pricing and what happens?
- Speaker #1
It guesses. It has to guess your intent so it just spits out the most generic 101 level content imaginable, which means you've just wasted time generating something you now have to rewrite from scratch.
- Speaker #0
Then you have the total opposite, which I've definitely been guilty of.
- Speaker #1
The kitchen sink approach.
- Speaker #0
Yeah. You just throw like 20 bullet points at it, hoping that more information will solve the problem.
- Speaker #1
But it just creates confusion. The AI gets overwhelmed. It doesn't know what's a priority. And it ends up missing half of your key instructions anyway.
- Speaker #0
So those are tactical mistakes. But the bigger ones, the ones that really cost you, are more strategic. They're about context and tone.
- Speaker #1
Absolutely. The missing context problem is a strategic killer. If you don't tell the AI who the audience is, what the business goals are, it might produce something that's technically perfect.
- Speaker #0
Great grammar, good structure.
- Speaker #1
Perfect. But it's strategically useless because it's not tailored to the person reading it. It's just content for the sake of content.
- Speaker #0
And the last big one, the tone drift issue. This one drives me crazy. You say make it professional and it just sounds like a robot.
- Speaker #1
Or worse, it sounds nothing like your brand. It forces you to spend all this time rewriting AI speak into something that sounds, well, human.
- Speaker #0
Okay.
- Speaker #1
The beauty of this Goldilocks formula is that it systematically addresses all four of those failures. It gives you levers of control.
- Speaker #0
So you're moving from just hoping the AI gets it to actually engineering the output.
- Speaker #1
That's precisely.
- Speaker #0
All right. Let's unpack those first three components then.
- Speaker #1
Yeah.
- Speaker #0
The ones that define what the AI is supposed to achieve. The core of it all.
- Speaker #1
Okay. So component number one is the objective. This is your North Star. It's one clear sentence stating the content's purpose, and it has to connect directly to a business goal.
- Speaker #0
So this isn't just the topic. It's the mission.
- Speaker #1
That's the perfect word for it. the mission.
- Speaker #0
So what needs to be in there, the content type, I assume, maybe length, what you want the reader to do.
- Speaker #1
Exactly. Let's compare. To a vague prompt is just write about pricing.
- Speaker #0
Which we've established is useless. So what's the Goldilocks version?
- Speaker #1
The Just Write objective is something like create a 1200 word pricing comparison guide that helps B2B SaaS prospects evaluate subscription models, positioning our solution as more flexible than competitors. See the difference. You haven't just asked for facts. You've asked for a piece of persuasive marketing with a specific competitive angle. The AI now knows to focus on comparison and risk mitigation.
- Speaker #0
That one sentence feels like it could cut down revision time by half. But let's be honest, doesn't writing that just right objective take a while? Where's the efficiency gain there?
- Speaker #1
That's a fair question. At first, yeah, it might take you an extra two minutes to write a really solid prompt.
- Speaker #0
OK.
- Speaker #1
But you have to compare those two minutes against the two hours you'd spend editing a generic draft. You front load the strategy, and the efficiency comes from that massive reduction in editing time.
- Speaker #0
That makes a ton of sense. So if objective is what to do. How do we make sure it's for the right person?
- Speaker #1
Right.
- Speaker #0
Which I guess brings us to component two, context.
- Speaker #1
Context is the strategic foundation. This is where you feed the AI all the details you have about your audience from your persona research. It helps the AI understand who is reading this and what their situation is.
- Speaker #0
So you're giving it all the good stuff. Their job title, their pain points, what other solutions they're looking at.
- Speaker #1
Exactly. If you don't, it just defaults to this generic middle ground that doesn't really speak to anyone.
- Speaker #0
The too vague version being. For business users.
- Speaker #1
Right. But the just right context is way more specific. For CFOs at 50 to 500 employee companies, they're evaluating their first sauce purchase, have limited tech knowledge but strong financial expertise, and they're worried about hidden implementation costs.
- Speaker #0
Okay, so that changes everything.
- Speaker #1
It completely changes the AI's decision making. It's not pulling from a general business vocabulary anymore. Now it's prioritizing financial terms, ROI, risk. And it's avoiding all the technical jargon that a CFO wouldn't care about.
- Speaker #0
You're basically giving it the right dictionary to pull from, which leads perfectly into number three, voice. This feels like the hardest part to get right, making it not sound robotic.
- Speaker #1
Voice is your brand's DNA. And it goes way beyond just saying, be friendly. You need to get specific.
- Speaker #0
What kinds of specifics?
- Speaker #1
Tone descriptors, like, is it consultative or authoritative? Sentence length preferences. vocabulary you like or dislike, even rules about humor.
- Speaker #0
So instead of the too vague professional tone.
- Speaker #1
Which just gives you dry academic tech.
- Speaker #0
If just right plumped would be much more detailed.
- Speaker #1
Exactly. Something like consultative but approachable. Use you to engage the reader. Very sentence length. Aim for an average of 15 to 20 words. Light humor is okay, but no sarcasm. And maintain a confident tone without being condescending.
- Speaker #0
You're basically building the editor's style guide right into the prompt.
- Speaker #1
Yes. You are. So now we've defined what to write, who to write it for, and how it should sound. Now we get into the final two, which define how it looks and, really importantly, its boundaries.
- Speaker #0
Right. So this is component four, structure, the organizational framework, making sure it's actually usable right out of the gate.
- Speaker #1
This is your blueprint. You specify the headings, the word count for each section, if you need lists or tables, and, of course, where your SEO keywords need to go. It's like a detailed statement of work.
- Speaker #0
But we've all used the too vague version, which is just... Make it well-structured.
- Speaker #1
And hoped for the best.
- Speaker #0
Yeah.
- Speaker #1
But the just right instruction gives it a clear framework it can't ignore. Create a 1,500-word blog post. Intro. 150 to 200 words. Four main sections with H2 headings, 250 to 300 words each. Conclusion with a CTA. The primary keyword subscription pricing models must be in the title, first paragraph. and at least two H2s.
- Speaker #0
You're forcing it to comply with your editorial standards before it even writes a word. That's a huge lever.
- Speaker #1
Which brings us to the last one, component five, constraints. This is the one people miss all the time, and it's all about risk and brand protection.
- Speaker #0
So setting boundaries, what kind of constraints are we talking about here?
- Speaker #1
Well, source requirements for data is a big one. Compliance limitations are critical, like avoid giving medical advice or don't make financial guarantees.
- Speaker #0
You can even set things like a target reading level.
- Speaker #1
Yes, like an 8th or 9th grade reading level. And you can explicitly list topics or words to avoid. It's your safety net.
- Speaker #0
So instead of just keep it compliant.
- Speaker #1
Which means nothing to an AI. The just right constraint is crystal clear. Do not make performance claims without sourced data. Avoid mentioning competitors by name. Maintain an 8th grade reading level. Do not promise financial outcomes.
- Speaker #0
It's all about mitigating risk. before it even becomes an issue. Okay, so once you get those five down, what's next? How do you take it to an even higher level?
- Speaker #1
This is where you go from just a user to more of an expert partner with the AI. The first advanced technique is something called style primers.
- Speaker #0
A style primer?
- Speaker #1
Instead of just describing your voice, you include a short paragraph in your ideal style right in the prompt. You give it a concrete example to copy.
- Speaker #0
So you show it, you don't just tell it.
- Speaker #1
Exactly. The AI is a pattern matching machine. If you give it a paragraph that starts with something like... You've been here before. The budget's approved. It instantly picks up on the rhythm, the tone, the entire feel you're going for.
- Speaker #0
That's brilliant. What else?
- Speaker #1
Role-based instructions. This is powerful. Don't just ask it to write. Ask it to adopt a persona. Approach this as an experienced CFO. It instantly adds a layer of authority and credibility.
- Speaker #0
I love that. And you also mentioned something about tiered content structuring.
- Speaker #1
Yeah, this is great for reaching a wider audience. You ask it to structure the content for three types of readers at once.
- Speaker #0
Skimmers, browsers, and deep readers.
- Speaker #1
Right. Bold subheadings for the skimmers, clear intros and conclusions for browsers, and detailed evidence for the deep readers. You get an asset that works for everyone.
- Speaker #0
Okay, but even with all this, things can go wrong. Let's do some quick troubleshooting. What if my content still comes out?
- Speaker #1
Just generic and boring.
- Speaker #0
Diagnosis is almost always a weak voice or context component.
- Speaker #1
And the fix. The fix is to use a style primer and then get really explicit. Tell it to use storytelling elements or vivid metaphors. You have to actively instruct it to be more creative.
- Speaker #0
Okay. What if it's factually weak or superficial? The structure is right, but there's no depth.
- Speaker #1
That's a weak objective or weak constraints. You didn't demand depth, so it gave you breadth.
- Speaker #0
So I need to set minimums.
- Speaker #1
You have to. Tell it each point must be supported by a real-world example, a statistic with a source, or a logical explanation of at least three sentences. You have to enforce depth.
- Speaker #0
And the last one, the one that's so persistent, the tone is just off-brand. What's the fix there?
- Speaker #1
You need to give it guardrails. Use both positive examples, the DOs, and negative examples, the don'ts.
- Speaker #0
That's smart.
- Speaker #1
Don't just say be confident. Say don't use hyperbole. Don't use passive voice. Defining that negative space is often more effective than just defining the positive.
- Speaker #0
So using this whole formula, it's not just about getting one good draft. It's about creating a scalable system for your whole organization.
- Speaker #1
And that scalability comes from one key practice, maintaining a prompt library. This is about turning your successful prompts into institutional knowledge, into assets.
- Speaker #0
So what does that look like in practice?
- Speaker #1
It means, first, you document your outcomes. Track how much editing time was needed. Track how the content actually performed. Use that data. Second, create standardized prompt templates for different content types. One for blogs, one for emails, and so on.
- Speaker #0
And you have to use version control.
- Speaker #1
Absolutely. Give your prompts version numbers. Note why you made a change. This is how you continuously optimize instead of just reinventing the wheel every time.
- Speaker #0
We actually saw this in action with a B2B software company. They were struggling with inconsistent content, tons of editing time. They implemented this Goldilocks template for all their big assets.
- Speaker #1
And the results were, I mean, they were transformative. They cut editing time on first drafts by 68%. That alone is a massive win.
- Speaker #0
But it wasn't just speed. Organic traffic went up 42% in three months because the content was so much more targeted.
- Speaker #1
And the big one. Content-attributed leads went up 35%. This proved it wasn't just about making things faster. It was about making them better, better quality content that actually drove business goals.
- Speaker #0
So to recap one last time, the Goldilocks formula, objective, context, voice, structure, and constraints. This framework is, I think, the most powerful tool you have to get from that frustrating generic output to a high-quality draft that's already 90% of the way there.
- Speaker #1
The real benefit for you is that you can finally scale your content production without sacrificing your brand or the quality of your work. But it's so important to remember this one thing.
- Speaker #0
What's that?
- Speaker #1
Prompting is both an art and a science. This formula, this framework, it provides the science, the repeatable structure.
- Speaker #0
And your expertise, your knowledge of your business, your audience, that provides the art.
- Speaker #1
That's the specific guidance that makes the output uniquely valuable to you. The future really belongs to people who can partner with AI this way. combining that human strategic clarity with the machine's efficiency.
- Speaker #0
You're leveraging it as a brilliant execution engine, but you are still the driver.
- Speaker #1
You are the strategist.
- Speaker #0
So your homework is simple. Take this five-part formula and apply it to the very next piece of content you create. Track your revision time. I think you'll be amazed at the difference. We'll see you next time on The Deep Dive.