Limiting lead use for outdoor shooting and fishing: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committees cover
Limiting lead use for outdoor shooting and fishing: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committees cover
Safer Chemicals Podcast

Limiting lead use for outdoor shooting and fishing: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committees

Limiting lead use for outdoor shooting and fishing: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committees

32min |07/12/2022|

281

Play
Limiting lead use for outdoor shooting and fishing: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committees cover
Limiting lead use for outdoor shooting and fishing: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committees cover
Safer Chemicals Podcast

Limiting lead use for outdoor shooting and fishing: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committees

Limiting lead use for outdoor shooting and fishing: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committees

32min |07/12/2022|

281

Play

Description

Our scientific committees have had their last meetings of the year and in this episode we cover the outcomes of the Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis committees.

Tim, the Chair of the Risk Assessment Committee and Maria who chairs the Socio-Economic Analysis Committee join us.

We talk about the restriction of lead ammunition for hunting and outdoor sports shooting and lead used in fishing tackle. Here, the Socio-Economic Analysis Committee adopted its opinion on the costs and benefits and the Risk Assessment Committee carried out a further analysis of data from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on the risks from ingesting lead through game meat.

Also on the agenda were the restriction of Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in clay targets for shooting and an opinion on occupational exposure limits for cobalt and inorganic cobalt compounds.

Tim also talks us through setting a derived no-effect level for DOTE to protect workers, a chemical which is on the REACH Authorisation List of substances of very high concern.

What the committees do

The two committees prepare scientific opinions that are used by the European Commission and EU member states when deciding how chemical risks need to be controlled. They are made up of scientists from EU Member States and have observers from EU organisations that represent different sectors and interests.

Related episodes:

Full episode transcript

Give us feedback

More

**************


Follow us on:


Visit our website

Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication. 


Hosted by Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Chapters

  • Restricting use of lead ammunition in outdoor shooting and fishing

    00:44

  • What was checked by the Risk Assessment Committee in relation to EFSA's data on lead in game meat and what was the outcome?

    01:23

  • Summary of the Risk Assessment Committee June opinion on lead

    04:12

  • Socio-Economic Analysis Committee conclusions on lead in outdoor shooting and fishing

    05:35

  • Derogation of lead gunshot for sports shooting

    07:46

  • What other aspects were looked at in addition to costs and emissions?

    09:10

  • Ensuring supply of lead ammunition for military use

    13:00

  • Alternatives to lead ammunition and their costs

    14:03

  • Impact of lead restriction on fishing (sinkers and lures)

    15:15

  • Alternatives to lead in fishing

    17:05

  • Next steps for committee opinions on lead

    17:55

  • Socio-Economic Analysis Committee opinion on PAHs in clay targets

    18:17

  • Transition periods and Russia trade sanction impacts on PAH restriction

    19:20

  • Risk Assessment Committee: occupational exposure limits for cobalt and inorganic cobalt compounds

    21:29

  • Setting a derived no-effect level for DOTE

    28:56

Description

Our scientific committees have had their last meetings of the year and in this episode we cover the outcomes of the Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis committees.

Tim, the Chair of the Risk Assessment Committee and Maria who chairs the Socio-Economic Analysis Committee join us.

We talk about the restriction of lead ammunition for hunting and outdoor sports shooting and lead used in fishing tackle. Here, the Socio-Economic Analysis Committee adopted its opinion on the costs and benefits and the Risk Assessment Committee carried out a further analysis of data from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on the risks from ingesting lead through game meat.

Also on the agenda were the restriction of Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in clay targets for shooting and an opinion on occupational exposure limits for cobalt and inorganic cobalt compounds.

Tim also talks us through setting a derived no-effect level for DOTE to protect workers, a chemical which is on the REACH Authorisation List of substances of very high concern.

What the committees do

The two committees prepare scientific opinions that are used by the European Commission and EU member states when deciding how chemical risks need to be controlled. They are made up of scientists from EU Member States and have observers from EU organisations that represent different sectors and interests.

Related episodes:

Full episode transcript

Give us feedback

More

**************


Follow us on:


Visit our website

Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication. 


Hosted by Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Chapters

  • Restricting use of lead ammunition in outdoor shooting and fishing

    00:44

  • What was checked by the Risk Assessment Committee in relation to EFSA's data on lead in game meat and what was the outcome?

    01:23

  • Summary of the Risk Assessment Committee June opinion on lead

    04:12

  • Socio-Economic Analysis Committee conclusions on lead in outdoor shooting and fishing

    05:35

  • Derogation of lead gunshot for sports shooting

    07:46

  • What other aspects were looked at in addition to costs and emissions?

    09:10

  • Ensuring supply of lead ammunition for military use

    13:00

  • Alternatives to lead ammunition and their costs

    14:03

  • Impact of lead restriction on fishing (sinkers and lures)

    15:15

  • Alternatives to lead in fishing

    17:05

  • Next steps for committee opinions on lead

    17:55

  • Socio-Economic Analysis Committee opinion on PAHs in clay targets

    18:17

  • Transition periods and Russia trade sanction impacts on PAH restriction

    19:20

  • Risk Assessment Committee: occupational exposure limits for cobalt and inorganic cobalt compounds

    21:29

  • Setting a derived no-effect level for DOTE

    28:56

Share

Embed

You may also like

Description

Our scientific committees have had their last meetings of the year and in this episode we cover the outcomes of the Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis committees.

Tim, the Chair of the Risk Assessment Committee and Maria who chairs the Socio-Economic Analysis Committee join us.

We talk about the restriction of lead ammunition for hunting and outdoor sports shooting and lead used in fishing tackle. Here, the Socio-Economic Analysis Committee adopted its opinion on the costs and benefits and the Risk Assessment Committee carried out a further analysis of data from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on the risks from ingesting lead through game meat.

Also on the agenda were the restriction of Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in clay targets for shooting and an opinion on occupational exposure limits for cobalt and inorganic cobalt compounds.

Tim also talks us through setting a derived no-effect level for DOTE to protect workers, a chemical which is on the REACH Authorisation List of substances of very high concern.

What the committees do

The two committees prepare scientific opinions that are used by the European Commission and EU member states when deciding how chemical risks need to be controlled. They are made up of scientists from EU Member States and have observers from EU organisations that represent different sectors and interests.

Related episodes:

Full episode transcript

Give us feedback

More

**************


Follow us on:


Visit our website

Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication. 


Hosted by Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Chapters

  • Restricting use of lead ammunition in outdoor shooting and fishing

    00:44

  • What was checked by the Risk Assessment Committee in relation to EFSA's data on lead in game meat and what was the outcome?

    01:23

  • Summary of the Risk Assessment Committee June opinion on lead

    04:12

  • Socio-Economic Analysis Committee conclusions on lead in outdoor shooting and fishing

    05:35

  • Derogation of lead gunshot for sports shooting

    07:46

  • What other aspects were looked at in addition to costs and emissions?

    09:10

  • Ensuring supply of lead ammunition for military use

    13:00

  • Alternatives to lead ammunition and their costs

    14:03

  • Impact of lead restriction on fishing (sinkers and lures)

    15:15

  • Alternatives to lead in fishing

    17:05

  • Next steps for committee opinions on lead

    17:55

  • Socio-Economic Analysis Committee opinion on PAHs in clay targets

    18:17

  • Transition periods and Russia trade sanction impacts on PAH restriction

    19:20

  • Risk Assessment Committee: occupational exposure limits for cobalt and inorganic cobalt compounds

    21:29

  • Setting a derived no-effect level for DOTE

    28:56

Description

Our scientific committees have had their last meetings of the year and in this episode we cover the outcomes of the Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis committees.

Tim, the Chair of the Risk Assessment Committee and Maria who chairs the Socio-Economic Analysis Committee join us.

We talk about the restriction of lead ammunition for hunting and outdoor sports shooting and lead used in fishing tackle. Here, the Socio-Economic Analysis Committee adopted its opinion on the costs and benefits and the Risk Assessment Committee carried out a further analysis of data from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on the risks from ingesting lead through game meat.

Also on the agenda were the restriction of Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in clay targets for shooting and an opinion on occupational exposure limits for cobalt and inorganic cobalt compounds.

Tim also talks us through setting a derived no-effect level for DOTE to protect workers, a chemical which is on the REACH Authorisation List of substances of very high concern.

What the committees do

The two committees prepare scientific opinions that are used by the European Commission and EU member states when deciding how chemical risks need to be controlled. They are made up of scientists from EU Member States and have observers from EU organisations that represent different sectors and interests.

Related episodes:

Full episode transcript

Give us feedback

More

**************


Follow us on:


Visit our website

Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication. 


Hosted by Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Chapters

  • Restricting use of lead ammunition in outdoor shooting and fishing

    00:44

  • What was checked by the Risk Assessment Committee in relation to EFSA's data on lead in game meat and what was the outcome?

    01:23

  • Summary of the Risk Assessment Committee June opinion on lead

    04:12

  • Socio-Economic Analysis Committee conclusions on lead in outdoor shooting and fishing

    05:35

  • Derogation of lead gunshot for sports shooting

    07:46

  • What other aspects were looked at in addition to costs and emissions?

    09:10

  • Ensuring supply of lead ammunition for military use

    13:00

  • Alternatives to lead ammunition and their costs

    14:03

  • Impact of lead restriction on fishing (sinkers and lures)

    15:15

  • Alternatives to lead in fishing

    17:05

  • Next steps for committee opinions on lead

    17:55

  • Socio-Economic Analysis Committee opinion on PAHs in clay targets

    18:17

  • Transition periods and Russia trade sanction impacts on PAH restriction

    19:20

  • Risk Assessment Committee: occupational exposure limits for cobalt and inorganic cobalt compounds

    21:29

  • Setting a derived no-effect level for DOTE

    28:56

Share

Embed

You may also like