Transcription

• Speaker #0

  Welcome to the Deep Dive. Today, we're digging into one of those terms you hear everywhere, quiet quitting. It really blew up. But what we want to understand is, you know, what's behind the silence, especially with Gen Z.

• Speaker #1

  That's exactly it. We've been looking at some material from Benoit van Kallenberg, and he argues pretty strongly, actually, that companies are just looking in the wrong places.

• Speaker #0

  Wrong places how?

• Speaker #1

  Well, if leaders think, oh, let's roll out another engagement survey or, you know, launch some new campaign. They're completely missing the point. It's not about more dashboards.

• Speaker #0

  Okay, so our mission today is to get past that buzzword. We want to pull out the real actionable stuff on how companies can genuinely, really listen to what Gen Z is saying, or maybe not saying, about their workplaces.

• Speaker #1

  And that's where it gets, well, uncomfortable for some leaders. The main idea in the source is that the answer isn't outside the company. It means we have to listen differently. And maybe the hardest part, look inward. at our own culture, our own behaviors.

• Speaker #0

  Okay, let's dive right into that. The source says quiet quitting isn't really about laziness or, you know, a lack of drive. It's more like a quiet retreat because, well, the source says something doesn't feel right. So if it's not motivation, what is it?

• Speaker #1

  It's almost like a quiet self-protection. What's really interesting is how this retreat happens. It's gradual. It's not like they storm out.

• Speaker #0

  Right.

• Speaker #1

  They fade first from meetings, then from meaning.

• Speaker #0

  Meaning, like purpose in their job.

• Speaker #1

  Yeah, exactly. And eventually they check out emotionally and then, you know, physically they might leave the organization altogether. It's this slow, quiet withdrawal.

• Speaker #0

  That subtlety. I can see how that gets missed. And the source points out this big mistake companies make. They see the signs, maybe less energy, less participation.

• Speaker #1

  And they totally misread it. Yeah. They rush off to start some new initiative or worse, hire consultants to find some magic answer.

• Speaker #0

  When the answer is right there.

• Speaker #1

  Exactly. Why keep looking outside? Because looking inside is tough. Van Kallenberg says the inside is already within their walls. That discomfort Gen Z feels. It's not just some random generational thing. It's reflecting a workplace that just hasn't kept up, hasn't adapted to what they value.

• Speaker #0

  So it's not about fixing Gen Z. It's about fixing the environment.

• Speaker #1

  Precisely. It's acknowledging the environment needs work, not just figuring out how to handle this new generation.

• Speaker #0

  But if the insight's already there, why don't more companies see it? Are they deliberately ignoring it or just blind to it?

• Speaker #1

  I think it's often a kind of structural blindness. The system, you know, it rewards the obvious stuff hitting targets. Visible activity. Not necessarily internal health or psychological safety.

• Speaker #0

  Right. Nobody gets a bonus for noticing someone's quietly checking out.

• Speaker #1

  Exactly. And that leads perfectly into the next point. Why this generation seems so good at picking up on those subtle things.

• Speaker #0

  Yeah. That makes sense. If the retreat is subtle, they must be pretty observant. The material calls them observant, attuned to the subtle currents of workplace culture. It even says they are reading you.

• Speaker #1

  They really are. They seem to have this incredibly fine-tuned BS detector. They notice those little gaps.

• Speaker #0

  Gaps.

• Speaker #1

  Yeah, the gaps between the values you talk about. You know, the posters about innovation or balance and what actually gets rewarded in the culture. Like the boss who... sends emails late at night or meetings that clearly aren't productive, they decode that silence, that inconsistency, just like they'd read a Slack message. It's all data to them.

• Speaker #0

  Okay. But wanting consistency, wanting the company to walk the talk, isn't that true for everyone? Why is it supposedly different for Gen Z?

• Speaker #1

  That's a fair question. But the source draws a really key distinction here. For older generations, maybe that consistency was like a nice to have, a sign of good leadership. For Gen Z, according to this material, That clarity between what's said and what's done, between the job ad and the actual job, it's presented as a fundamental necessity. It's like table stakes for them to even engage. If that trust isn't solid, they're not going to stick around.

• Speaker #0

  Wow. OK. That really changes the stakes. They're not just employees. They're like constant auditors.

• Speaker #1

  That's a great way to put it. They might not shout about it in the all hands meeting, but they are paying attention, concluding and deciding whether they belong.

• Speaker #0

  So the question leaders should ask isn't, why are they leaving?

• Speaker #1

  No, it needs to be more like what signals are we sending or maybe not sending that tell them we aren't really trustworthy? What are we missing here?

• Speaker #0

  Okay, so if the issue isn't motivation, but this observation gap, the solution has to be about opening up real honest channels inside the company. The source definitely warns against just copying what trendy tech companies do.

• Speaker #1

  Right, no chasing trends. It says focus on building a system of internal listening. And the keywords there are system, rooted in research, and sustained by trust.

• Speaker #0

  That sounds important, but system of internal listening. Doesn't that just sound like a fancy term for what HR is supposed to be doing anyway? How is this different?

• Speaker #1

  It's different because the goal isn't just to collect feedback, to sort of tweet the existing system or make people feel heard for a moment. It's about identifying and dismantling the actual cultural roadblocks to trust.

• Speaker #0

  Oh, okay.

• Speaker #1

  The material lays out two pretty different approaches to do this. To get past the usual corporate polish and find out what it really feels like to work there, especially for younger employees. The focus shifts from just satisfaction to these core trust signals.

• Speaker #0

  All right, let's get practical. First up is the quantitative approach, the Gen Z trust survey. The source says typical HR surveys often miss the mark, so this one's targeted.

• Speaker #1

  Yeah, targeted and built differently. Collaboratively with HR, aimed at maybe 200 to 1,000 Gen Z employees, anonymous, voluntary, crucial parts, and the questions are different.

• Speaker #0

  How so?

• Speaker #1

  We're moving away from just, are you happy with the coffee machine? It's about digging into what truly matters for their sense of trust and belonging. The survey needs to hit five core areas. Do I feel safe speaking up? Is feedback genuine or just lip service? Can I actually grow here? Or am I just a cog? Do I trust leadership? And this is a big one. Am I valued for more than just my output?

• Speaker #0

  Okay, those are definitely deeper questions. And this survey is built around five trust signals. This sounds like the core framework.

• Speaker #1

  Exactly. This is the foundation. Signal one, transparency. Simple, right? Clarity builds confidence. Signal two. Authenticity. Be a human first, then a leader.

• Speaker #0

  Makes sense. What's three?

• Speaker #1

  Progression. The source is super clear. Growth is the loyalty currency for Gen Z. If they feel stuck, they're already looking. Signal four is elasticity.

• Speaker #0

  Elasticity. Like flexibility.

• Speaker #1

  Yes, but deeper. That means the system needs to be flexible, adaptable. Rigid systems break under pressure. It's about building a workplace that can bend without breaking, accommodating life.

• Speaker #0

  Okay, that makes sense. And the fifth?

• Speaker #1

  Safety. Psychological safety. Believing you can take risks, maybe fail, suggest ideas without getting shut down. Yeah. That's where innovation actually happens.

• Speaker #0

  So putting elasticity and progression together, it sounds like they value flexible ways to grow, not just climbing a fixed ladder.

• Speaker #1

  Absolutely. They want structures that adapt, allow for different paths, maybe sideways moves, skill development. And the most critical part of this whole survey thing.

• Speaker #0

  Let me guess, actually doing something with the results.

• Speaker #1

  You got it. measuring this stuff and then doing nothing. That just screams inauthentic louder than anything. It proves their observations were right all along.

• Speaker #0

  Okay, so the survey gives us the numbers, the what, but numbers don't tell the whole story. That brings us to the second method, Gen Z culture labs, qualitative.

• Speaker #1

  Right. We need the stories, the nuance, the things people only say when they feel truly safe. Culture labs are designed for that. Small groups, maybe six to eight young employees, vary, and crucially. No managers, no senior leaders in the room, no corporate branding, just a facilitated, honest conversation. The facilitator isn't there to defend the company. They're there to draw out the truth.

• Speaker #0

  Wow. OK. And how do you start that conversation? The source has a really powerful opening question.

• Speaker #1

  Yeah, it's brilliant. What's one thing you see here that no one talks about?

• Speaker #0

  Oof, that cuts right through the usual meeting speak.

• Speaker #1

  It really does. It immediately signals this isn't a typical feedback session. It's an invitation to talk about the real stuff, the elephants in the room.

• Speaker #0

  But practically, how do you really keep hierarchy out? The facilitator, the analysts, they ultimately report upwards, right? Isn't there always that power dynamic lurking?

• Speaker #1

  That's a real risk, absolutely, which is why the facilitator's role is so critical. Their mindset has to be about pure listening, open mind, open heart, exploring the tensions, the disconnects.

• Speaker #0

  Not jumping in to fix things.

• Speaker #1

  Definitely not. The absolute goal is not... brainstorming solutions right then or defending why things are the way they are. The second someone feels the need to say, well, actually, we have a plan for that.

• Speaker #0

  Trust gone, lab failed.

• Speaker #1

  Exactly. It's a deep exercise in humility for the organization. Can you just receive the feedback without getting defensive?

• Speaker #0

  Let's underline the urgency here as we wrap up, because sitting back and doing nothing, the cost seems way higher than people might think. Time's up for just watching this happen.

• Speaker #1

  Oh, absolutely. The consequences laid out in the source are pretty stark. First, innovation just dries up when trust disappears. People won't stick their necks out if they don't feel safe. Right. Second, recruitment gets way harder. Word gets around. Young talent talks. And third, maybe the most modern twist, your culture's reputation. It travels fast.

• Speaker #0

  Yeah, it's not just Glassdoor anymore. It's TikTok, private chats, group messages. That story about your workplace culture spreads like wildfire. They are paying attention to the silence, the promises, the systems. And the sources, they're already reimagining what the future of work looks like.

• Speaker #1

  They are. And if companies aren't willing to build that future with them, they'll just go build it somewhere else.

• Speaker #0

  So. So understanding Gen Z isn't just about knowing the latest trends.

• Speaker #1

  Not at all. It's about a fundamental, profound cultural shift within your own company. It takes real humility, a willingness to truly see the environment you've created. The answer isn't more data points. It's deeper, more genuine listening built on actual trust. Hashtag outro pack.

• Speaker #0

  So to bring this all together from our deep dive. The companies that are going to win, the ones that will thrive, they'll be the ones that treat genuine insight, the stuff you uncover through these tough, honest internal talks as the actual foundation for change, not just a reaction or a side project.

• Speaker #1

  Exactly. And for you listening, maybe a final thought, something actionable you can do tomorrow requires zero budget. Start small, but be sincere. Show you're ready to learn. Ask someone, maybe a younger team member, a simple direct question like, what do you see that maybe we're missing?

• Speaker #0

  And then the hard part.

• Speaker #1

  Yeah. Ask it with real curiosity, not like you're ticking a box. And this is key, just be quiet. Really listen, even if the answer makes you uncomfortable. Absorb the truth.

• Speaker #0

  Gen Z is communicating. Through their actions, through their silence sometimes. They're asking if you're really paying attention. So the question we leave you with is this. Are you going to evolve with them, build a culture that genuinely earns trust? Or risk being left behind by the generation already shaping what work looks like next? What kind of workplace are you building? Thanks for tuning in.

• Speaker #1

  We'll catch you next time.