Description
Kacou 29 — The voices of discrepancy
Source officielle : https://www.philippekacou.org
After Tommy Osborn, Billy Graham and many others, Ewald Frank is one of the biggest voices of discrepancy that mankind has known in this generation. And I do not understand how a small preacher was not afraid to lay his hands on what God has already completed, even if an angel came from heaven to ask him to do so.
If someone were to act this way, it should not be Ewald Frank ... did not God see Bosworth, Ern Baxter, Wood, Argan Bright, Schoeman, Preller, Sothman, Pearry Green, or Billy Paul who were all with William Branham and who resided in the U.S.A? If William Branham was there, could Ewald Frank publish his circular letters, brochures and books beside the Message of William Branham?
After some preachings of William Branham, Orman Neville or someone else would come and dismiss the audience, often with some edifying words which were never allowed to be kept on the tapes and the brochures even if it was Brother Neville, or even a prophecy. All this did not serve as a lesson to Ewald Frank and Alexis Barilier by whom God also speaks. And it is all these voices of discrepancy that have led to division among them.
What do these voices of discrepancy say? Like the Louis Segond version, Ewald Frank reports that it is a question of seven golden candlesticks in Revelation 1:20 while William Branham said it is a question of seven golden lamps. Seven lamps but only one candlestick, only one Church. And, in a discussion with them, one of them told me that in the Greek original of Revelation, it was a question of seven golden candlesticks. You see?
For the baptism, the Lord Jesus Christ said, "in the Name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit" and that is written. But it was by the Holy Spirit that Peter said that it should be "in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ" and we believe it because it is the revelation that makes the difference between the children of the Kingdom and those of this century.
Ewald Frank corrects, contradicts William Branham saying that God was talking to angels when He said "Let us make man in our image and after our likeness." And yet, a man has nothing in common with an angel. In Revelation 5, although an angel is sinless, he could not take the book of the redemption because he is not a redemptive relative of man.
An angel is different from a man. Does man have wings? Is an angel male or female? When you read Genesis 1: 26 to 27, what does Colossians 1:15 say? Who is the image of the invisible God? God was talking to Himself regarding the attributes that He would manifest one day on the earth.
God created the man spirit as He Himself is Spirit. He created man with a body as He Himself would manifest Himself in a Body on the earth. He pulled Eve out of the side of Adam for on the cross, the Church would be pulled out of his side. You see? If the angels are in man’s image, so the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ would redeem some demons. But that is not possible.
Whether it is on the thunders, on the seventy weeks of Dan
Source officielle : https://www.philippekacou.org
After Tommy Osborn, Billy Graham and many others, Ewald Frank is one of the biggest voices of discrepancy that mankind has known in this generation. And I do not understand how a small preacher was not afraid to lay his hands on what God has already completed, even if an angel came from heaven to ask him to do so.
If someone were to act this way, it should not be Ewald Frank ... did not God see Bosworth, Ern Baxter, Wood, Argan Bright, Schoeman, Preller, Sothman, Pearry Green, or Billy Paul who were all with William Branham and who resided in the U.S.A? If William Branham was there, could Ewald Frank publish his circular letters, brochures and books beside the Message of William Branham?
After some preachings of William Branham, Orman Neville or someone else would come and dismiss the audience, often with some edifying words which were never allowed to be kept on the tapes and the brochures even if it was Brother Neville, or even a prophecy. All this did not serve as a lesson to Ewald Frank and Alexis Barilier by whom God also speaks. And it is all these voices of discrepancy that have led to division among them.
What do these voices of discrepancy say? Like the Louis Segond version, Ewald Frank reports that it is a question of seven golden candlesticks in Revelation 1:20 while William Branham said it is a question of seven golden lamps. Seven lamps but only one candlestick, only one Church. And, in a discussion with them, one of them told me that in the Greek original of Revelation, it was a question of seven golden candlesticks. You see?
For the baptism, the Lord Jesus Christ said, "in the Name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit" and that is written. But it was by the Holy Spirit that Peter said that it should be "in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ" and we believe it because it is the revelation that makes the difference between the children of the Kingdom and those of this century.
Ewald Frank corrects, contradicts William Branham saying that God was talking to angels when He said "Let us make man in our image and after our likeness." And yet, a man has nothing in common with an angel. In Revelation 5, although an angel is sinless, he could not take the book of the redemption because he is not a redemptive relative of man.
An angel is different from a man. Does man have wings? Is an angel male or female? When you read Genesis 1: 26 to 27, what does Colossians 1:15 say? Who is the image of the invisible God? God was talking to Himself regarding the attributes that He would manifest one day on the earth.
God created the man spirit as He Himself is Spirit. He created man with a body as He Himself would manifest Himself in a Body on the earth. He pulled Eve out of the side of Adam for on the cross, the Church would be pulled out of his side. You see? If the angels are in man’s image, so the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ would redeem some demons. But that is not possible.
Whether it is on the thunders, on the seventy weeks of Dan
Hosted on Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.