undefined cover
undefined cover
undefined cover
undefined cover
undefined cover
undefined cover
We politicised science and scientised politics – is that a problem? cover
We politicised science and scientised politics – is that a problem? cover
The Policy Nerd, by UNESCO

We politicised science and scientised politics – is that a problem?

We politicised science and scientised politics – is that a problem?

39min |14/04/2022
Play
undefined cover
undefined cover
undefined cover
undefined cover
undefined cover
undefined cover
We politicised science and scientised politics – is that a problem? cover
We politicised science and scientised politics – is that a problem? cover
The Policy Nerd, by UNESCO

We politicised science and scientised politics – is that a problem?

We politicised science and scientised politics – is that a problem?

39min |14/04/2022
Play

Description

Gil Eyal, Professor of Sociology at Columbia University, talks to us about trust in science, trust in expertise, and the slow demise of such. He explains that not all science is equal and neither is public trust in it. Regulatory science is what underpins policy and collective decision-making, yet this is exactly what the public mistrusts the most. Why? It has a lot to do with the distributional effects of regulatory science (as often, there are winners and losers), the politicization of science, and the scientization of politics. Listen closely to his discussion with UNESCO’s Iulia Sevciuc about all this.


Hosted by Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Description

Gil Eyal, Professor of Sociology at Columbia University, talks to us about trust in science, trust in expertise, and the slow demise of such. He explains that not all science is equal and neither is public trust in it. Regulatory science is what underpins policy and collective decision-making, yet this is exactly what the public mistrusts the most. Why? It has a lot to do with the distributional effects of regulatory science (as often, there are winners and losers), the politicization of science, and the scientization of politics. Listen closely to his discussion with UNESCO’s Iulia Sevciuc about all this.


Hosted by Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Share

Embed

You may also like

Description

Gil Eyal, Professor of Sociology at Columbia University, talks to us about trust in science, trust in expertise, and the slow demise of such. He explains that not all science is equal and neither is public trust in it. Regulatory science is what underpins policy and collective decision-making, yet this is exactly what the public mistrusts the most. Why? It has a lot to do with the distributional effects of regulatory science (as often, there are winners and losers), the politicization of science, and the scientization of politics. Listen closely to his discussion with UNESCO’s Iulia Sevciuc about all this.


Hosted by Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Description

Gil Eyal, Professor of Sociology at Columbia University, talks to us about trust in science, trust in expertise, and the slow demise of such. He explains that not all science is equal and neither is public trust in it. Regulatory science is what underpins policy and collective decision-making, yet this is exactly what the public mistrusts the most. Why? It has a lot to do with the distributional effects of regulatory science (as often, there are winners and losers), the politicization of science, and the scientization of politics. Listen closely to his discussion with UNESCO’s Iulia Sevciuc about all this.


Hosted by Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Share

Embed

You may also like

undefined cover
undefined cover