undefined cover
undefined cover
Episode 112: Do Cannabis Attorneys Already Have a Legal Workaround for 280E? cover
Episode 112: Do Cannabis Attorneys Already Have a Legal Workaround for 280E? cover
Weed Wonks

Episode 112: Do Cannabis Attorneys Already Have a Legal Workaround for 280E?

Episode 112: Do Cannabis Attorneys Already Have a Legal Workaround for 280E?

1h00 |17/11/2025
Play
undefined cover
undefined cover
Episode 112: Do Cannabis Attorneys Already Have a Legal Workaround for 280E? cover
Episode 112: Do Cannabis Attorneys Already Have a Legal Workaround for 280E? cover
Weed Wonks

Episode 112: Do Cannabis Attorneys Already Have a Legal Workaround for 280E?

Episode 112: Do Cannabis Attorneys Already Have a Legal Workaround for 280E?

1h00 |17/11/2025
Play

Description

In the latest episode of Weed Wonks, Jordan Wellington hosts attorneys Jen Benda, Rachel Gillette, and Nate Pollock for a discussion about Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code and a case in U.S. Tax Court that could be a game-changer for cannabis companies, even if rescheduling never happens.


Hosted on Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Description

In the latest episode of Weed Wonks, Jordan Wellington hosts attorneys Jen Benda, Rachel Gillette, and Nate Pollock for a discussion about Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code and a case in U.S. Tax Court that could be a game-changer for cannabis companies, even if rescheduling never happens.


Hosted on Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Share

Embed

You may also like

Description

In the latest episode of Weed Wonks, Jordan Wellington hosts attorneys Jen Benda, Rachel Gillette, and Nate Pollock for a discussion about Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code and a case in U.S. Tax Court that could be a game-changer for cannabis companies, even if rescheduling never happens.


Hosted on Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Description

In the latest episode of Weed Wonks, Jordan Wellington hosts attorneys Jen Benda, Rachel Gillette, and Nate Pollock for a discussion about Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code and a case in U.S. Tax Court that could be a game-changer for cannabis companies, even if rescheduling never happens.


Hosted on Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Share

Embed

You may also like