Description
Why do water professionals still trust dowsing rods, and how did a magician expose them?
So I traced dowsing from a coconut in an Indian field to the UK's water companies, an American engineering firm's podcast and the drillers of Australia. Then I looked at what the controlled tests say, from a magician's trial in Sydney to Kassel, and at what people really buy when they pay a dowser. It leads to my conversation with Christian Montag, CEO of iFlux, on measuring the water under our feet.
The figures come from the sources named in the video: Hans-Dieter Betz, the US Air Force Institute of Technology, James Randi's 1980 test, Kassel 1990, the US Geological Survey, the New York Times and the United Nations.
🌶️ KEY SPICES 🌶️
🔮 Dowsing at work: in 2017, 10 of the 12 big UK water companies said their engineers used rods
🎙️ Brown and Caldwell's Engineering Legends podcast hosted a dowser who "map dowses" from his office
🍷 Mark Mondavi: 40 years of water witching, more than 100 wells, and a wine label called the Divining Rod
🕳️ Water well drilling in Montgomery, Vermont: seven wells picked by hydrogeologists came up short, a dowser's eighth gave 300 gallons a minute (over 1,100 liters)
🎩 James Randi offered $10,000 in Sydney in 1980: 111 tries, 15 hits, about 12% against 10% for pure luck
🧠 Confirmation bias: the wells that worked get retold, the dry holes never do
🧽 Groundwater is not an underground river: an aquifer is porous material soaked like a sponge
💵 A geologist quoted $6,500 for a range and a probability, a dowser about $1,400 for a cross on the ground
☢️ Montgomery's eighth well also held uranium: 76 parts per billion, nearly three times the state limit
🥜 IN A NUTSHELL 🥜
Does dowsing work? In field reports it seems to, but in controlled tests dowsers score barely better than chance.
What are the tricks? Water is almost everywhere, the hands move the rods (the ideomotor effect), confirmation bias, and the wrong picture of what lies underground.
Why do professionals still pay for it? Because the underground is invisible, and the dowser sells certainty where the scientist sells a probability.
Why does it matter? Groundwater is about 99% of the liquid freshwater on Earth, and once polluted, it tends to stay polluted.
#️⃣ Mentioned Links #️⃣
📌 Interius Solutions: https://academy.interius.io/watertech-marketing-system
Use code ANTOINE15 for 15% off the Interius Academy, their WaterTech Marketing System
(and yes, Björn only pays me if you sign up 😅)
Hosted on Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.


![Results DON’T Get Water CEOs Fired... But THIS Does [Corporate Politics & Governance Research] cover](https://image.ausha.co/5F8M451cUOK6txgjBIj3Tc1FWTRVJbO2IEggZMfS_400x400.jpeg)

