Background and Research Interests - 

00:35-02:11 Introduction

02:12-03:53 Could you elaborate on how these French and international judicial proceedings’ experiences honed your quest for law practice learning?

03:54-05:55  Were your practices and training in human rights, biomedicine, and sexual and cyber violence, part of your inspirations to start a research career?

05:56-07:57 What led you to analysing health related AI systems?

07:58-10:20  How did you choose the subjects of health practitioners and AI physical appearance discrimination?

IT Perspectives - Understanding the legal consequences 

10:21-13:43 Could you please illustrate the technicological occurrence of AI biases based on appearance discrimination?

13:44-14:50 Are there any technological ways to prevent these biaes?

14:51-17:12  Could you please elaborate on the remote sensors you studied and how they work? 

17:13-20:37 What technical mistakes exist and how do they impact patients?

Legal Perspectives

20:38-22:57 What is your feeling on the legal context Ai law reseachers are currently in?

22:58-25:35 Do you think the risk of these discriminatory biases is known to concerned individuals and adequately approached by lawmakers?

25:36-28:58 What concrete legal measures exist to avoid this discrimination? 

28:59-31:40 In your opinion, what are the main shortcomings of existing standards in regulating discriminatory biases?  

On health censors and health liabilities

31:41-37:25 How did you establish a link between this French law and the health professional’s liability?

37:26-39:03 On the damage, French law recognises several harms, in the case of the harm suffered by patients in medical sensors, how easy is it to apprehend by French Law? 

Signature questions

39:04-40:00 What key advice would you give to women exploring the world of AI and law?

Hosted on Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.