Chapters

• Introduction

  35sec

• Could you elaborate on how these French and international judicial proceedings’ experiences honed your quest for law practice learning?

  2min

• Were your practices and training in human rights, biomedicine, and sexual and cyber violence, part of your inspirations to start research?

  3min

• What led you to analysing health related AI systems?

  5min

• How did you choose the subjects of health practitioners and AI physical appearance discrimination?

  7min

• Could you please illustrate the technicological occurrence of AI biases based on appearance discrimination?

  10min

• Are there any technological ways to prevent these biaes?

  13min

• Could you please elaborate on the remote sensors you studied and how they work?

  14min

• What technical mistakes exist and how do they impact patients?

  17min

• What is your feeling on the legal context Ai law reseachers are currently in?

  20min

• Do you think the risk of these discriminatory biases is known to concerned individuals and adequately approached by lawmakers?

  22min

• What concrete legal measures exist to avoid this discrimination?

  25min

• In your opinion, what are the main shortcomings of existing standards in regulating discriminatory biases?

  28min

• How did you establish a link between this French law and the health professional’s liability?

  31min

• French law recognises several harms, in the case of the harm suffered by patients in medical sensors, how easy is it to apprehend by Law?

  37min

• What key advice would you give to women exploring the world of AI and law?

  39min